<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sonera Shifting Email Services to Avoid Swedish Spy Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sigillu.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/sonera-shifting-email-services-to-avoid-swedish-spy-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sigillu.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/sonera-shifting-email-services-to-avoid-swedish-spy-laws/</link>
	<description>Secure Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Strange</title>
		<link>http://sigillu.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/sonera-shifting-email-services-to-avoid-swedish-spy-laws/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Strange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigillu.wordpress.com/?p=242#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>Whilst I understand that Finnish customers, wishing to send domestic emails should not have to put up with a foreign power intercepting their emails, the theory behind legal intercept, appears, in today&#039;s climate of terrorism, to be a valid concept.  It seems unlikely that Finland will be far behind in legal intercept.  One also has to wonder what will happen if a Federated Europe decides to use legal intercept across the whole of europe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I understand that Finnish customers, wishing to send domestic emails should not have to put up with a foreign power intercepting their emails, the theory behind legal intercept, appears, in today&#8217;s climate of terrorism, to be a valid concept.  It seems unlikely that Finland will be far behind in legal intercept.  One also has to wonder what will happen if a Federated Europe decides to use legal intercept across the whole of europe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
